Sense from Seattle

Common sense thoughts on life and current affairs by a Seattle area sexagenarian, drawing on personal experience, years of learning as a counselor to thousands of families and an innate passion for informed knowledge, to uniquely express sensible, thoughtful, honest and independent views.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Candidate Update


Holiday visits and other activities have kept me from publishing here lately, but I have continued to follow the progress toward choosing candidates to contend for the Presidency.

Only compulsive Republicans and naive non-politicals fail to realize the country needs a Democrat back in the White House. The Democrat candidates are consistently aligned with this national longing, with only minor variations from the candidates on the central themes. The Republicans are out of step, both with the electorate and with each other, their views widely diverging on many issues.

For the Democrats, it is still between Clinton and Obama. She is obviously the best prepared and most immediately capable, but some voters confess to a reluctance to elect a woman, and still more are concerned that another Clinton is not the ideal way to move forward. Obama has failed to capitalize on the charisma factor to convince voters he is ready now to lead us. It still looks like his best chance is if voters act on their Hillary reluctance. Hillary is not going to change her tune the rest of the way to the nomination. If Obama wants to beat her, he has to project more leadership capability to the voters, while playing on their uncertainty over Hillary. Nowadays only overt racists admit to voting just for all-whites, but America has too negative a record on race to rule such prejudice out as a factor in some voters decision on Obama. [Race is a mostly unspoken concern in the current frenzy to stop brown skinned "illegals" from entering the US from Mexico].

The Republican race is more amusing, but also more scary if somehow one of these pretenders were to actually get elected [a circumstance which would make me seriously consider the sanity of the American electorate]. Romney has the money and the looks, but his Mormonism finally forced him to give a speech intended to downplay its role in his potential Presidency. In that speech Romney tried to align Mormonism with Judeo-Christian religion, but then went overboard by making such religion a virtual pre-requisite for being a true American. Giuiliani has played the fear card so much that it has become a joke. Plus he has had as many wives as Romney's great-grandfather probably had, only just not all at the same time [mistresses in waiting are not yet counted as wives, though they may be entitled to taxpayer paid police protection, as Rudy's current wife received when she was only the Mayoral mistress]. Mike Huckabee, the Baptist minister and former Arkansas Governor, has shot up in the polls, a sign of disenchantment with Mitt and Rudy. Huckabee is genuinely nice and compassionate, but his evangelical credentials are starting to bump into reality as people pay more attention to him, such as his prior advocacy for quarantining HIV positive people.

The busy holiday season flies by and then the Iowa caucus, New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries become the preliminary bouts on the way to the main event. Following all the primaries in February, including one here in Washington State which I only recently realized is scheduled, the candidates will in all likelihood have been chosen. Then the main event will start. My current sense is the contender in the blue trunks will be Hillary Clinton. Who wears the red is more uncertain, but it could be the surprising Huckabee. Regardless of who wears red, I expect Hillary to win by a TKO.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tom,
What is happening in this country? President Huckabee? What a terrible thought.

His surgence makes me root for the following Republicans if a Democrat cannot win:

Rudy Guiliani
Mitt Romney
John from Phoenix

9:10 PM  
Blogger Tom Blake said...

John, I have some questions for you:

1. What is it about Huckabee that makes him more terrible for you to think of as President than Giuliani or Romney?

2. Are there any other Republican candidates you favor more than Giuiliani or Romney, but left out of your comment because they are not viable, and if so, who are they and why do you favor them?

2. What is it about Giuliani that makes him the least unpalatable Republican to you?

3. Why is Romney second?

4. Why did you not mention your fellow Arizonan McCain?

5. Of the three Republicans you mentioned, in what order do you think they would have the best chance of defeating Hillary?

6. When you said "root", you do mean the lesser of multiple Republican evils, don't you?

5:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tom,
1. Actually I know little about Huckabee. As you can see I didn't even know how to spell his name. But he has guilt by association, which, in this case is the religious right wing. Most people are like me in never hearing of him. So how did he become the front runner or close to it? Because of a conspiracy of the religious right wing.

This description of why I don't like him is not sufficient to say why he should not be President. I recognize my reaction could be interpreted as bigotry. However, values are very important in picking a President. My values differ greatly from the religious right.

2. John McCain would be a good President, but I left him off because he continues to support the Iraq war and because he has no chance of winning the Republican primary.

3. Giuliani is a real person and led a real life. The US should not have a rigidly ideological President. George W should have made us all feel that way. This is a debatable point, but I think Giuliani is the most intelligent of the Republican leaders. I think that is very important, and again George W should have taught us that.

4. Romney is a flip flopper. I don't think that is bad because politicians must be responsive to the electorate. But he is really coming across as pandering. On the other side, I value the characters of most Mormons I have known. I have Mormon friends, Mormon relatives, and work for a Mormon company. In general they are good business people, are highly ethical, and generally embody the virtues we all hold in esteem. They are also driven people, have high aspirations to succeed, anbd work hard at that.

Romney would be a very good President, but, like McCain, is stuggling with his own party which is now challenging him with a third rate Huckabee.

5. Guiliani and Romney will easily defeat Hillary. I'm sure Hillary is rooting for Huckabee.

6. I don't think the Republican candidates are evil. I think they all (with the exception of Huckabee) will get rid of the evil neocons in the Bush administration. I think Bush has already begun that process. I think the influence of the protestant religious right should be stopped. That's why Huckabee is a menace. But I would be happy with Guiliani or Romney.

My inclination is to go with the Democratic Congress, but Nancy Pelosi is a problem. We need a Speaker who cares about the country instead of her private interests. We need someone who is in the center, who will bring the Democrats and moderate Republicans into a force for good.

John from Phoenix

7:54 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home