Sense from Seattle

Common sense thoughts on life and current affairs by a Seattle area sexagenarian, drawing on personal experience, years of learning as a counselor to thousands of families and an innate passion for informed knowledge, to uniquely express sensible, thoughtful, honest and independent views.

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Mavericks?


Samuel Maverick was a slave owning entrepreneur descended from a long line of Southerners. He became a Texas land baron, politician and cattleman before he died in 1970. When cattlemen adopted branding to avoid confusion over cattle ownership and to eliminate the violent confrontations that sometimes resulted from such confusion, Samuel was the only one who stubbornly refused to brand his cattle. When stampedes or wanderings mingled herds, the animals were separated by brands and the those with no brand, "Mavericks", were given back to Samuel. The name then started to be applied to a person with a streak of stubborn single-mindedness and apparent unwillingness to work cooperatively. Over time, perhaps aided 50 years ago by the James Garner western TV series, "Maverick", the name has acquired a more admirable association, as an individual who courageously stands up to abusive power.

John McCain has been a Republican all his life. Early in his long tenure as a U.S. Senator, McCain got into serious conflict of interest trouble involving campaign contributions. He was so scared by the experience that he turned in the other direction, proposing campaign finance limits, much to the chagrin of the Republican power holders who became annoyed at McCain and kept him out of the power loop in retaliation. McCain paid them back by once in a while bucking them on a vote and by cultivating good will with the press who liked his poking at Republican power. The Maverick label was applied, even though there was no question he belonged to the Republican herd. He was like a branded calf who occasionally strays for a little run and but always skedaddles back where he knows he belongs.

McCain has long had Presidential aspirations. For the 2000 election, he made his run. After a quick start, he was cut off at the ankles by Bush/Rove. He fumed about that for a while, but then as the very long 2008 campaigning was coming on, he thrust his sometime arguably marginal Maverick rump into the hot iron and became 90% Bush/Cheney branded.

Sarah Palin bears the brand of a Republican of extreme right wing views. She was hand picked for Republican boot camp, to learn how to work the culture wars and how to avoid giving honest answers on the issues. She played the Alaska Republican game and then, while serving as a commission appointee, she seized an opportunity to jump ahead by joining in condemnation of wrongdoing by fellow Republican commissioners and resigning the little time left in her appointment. Next, seeing the crooked incumbent Republican Governor was vulnerable, Palin claimed courageous reformer credentials as a result of her commission experience and entered a congested primary and won. For these actions, she is now claiming to be a fellow Maverick with John.

After eight years of Bush/Cheney, America is in terrible shape and headed in the wrong direction, as over 80% of Americans honestly admit. The branding iron shows McCain and Palin belong to the same Republican herd as Bush/Cheney. That is why they are claiming to be Mavericks. They don't want to be sent back where they belong, with the rest of the Republicans, to that bogus ranch in Crawford. Democrats need to keep riding herd to make sure everyone knows where these two head belong.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"There was no question he belonged to the Republican herd" is an interesting comment, but no authority for that stement is given.

I have several anecdotal comments from fellow Arizonans (McCain is an Arizona Senator) that McCain is not a true Republican. Most Arizona Republicans who held positions of authority fought the nomination of McCain publicly and behind the scenes. When McCain emerged as the probable winner (an astounding accomplishment that is under-reported by the press), Arizona Republican leaders reluctantly supported him. After he picked Sarah Palin, they have been falling all over themselves to push for his victory.
John from Phoenix

10:31 PM  
Blogger Tom Blake said...

I thought that statement might produce a comment from you, John. Let me flip it on you. Since McCain has been your Senator for 21 years and a Congressman from AZ for 4 years before that, you tell me what crucial votes he has made in Congress contrary to his fellow Republicans.

McCain has been floating along for years making claims like he did in the AARP Presidential questionnaire, "my career is replete with examples of the type of bipartisan problem solving that we need", without citing any examples. McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform is the only one people can name.

The AARP voters' guide in the Sept-Oct issue of the AARP magazine gave the candidates 11 issue boxes to check support or oppose, as to agreement with the AARP issue position. Obama agreed with the AARP on 10 out of 11, leaving one unchecked. McCain did not check any boxes at all, because his position on all 11 is the same as George W. Bush and he knows that is a loser.

The big steers in the Republican herd don't like McCain because he doesn't run along with his nose up their butts, but when it comes time to vote, he does get in line with them and when he decided to run for President this time around, he put his nose right where they wanted.

3:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You didn't mention his collaboration with Kennedy on immigration reform that was soundly defeated. That took a lot of courage in this state where anti-immigration is very popular among influential Republican leaders, most notably Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
John from Phoenix

5:42 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home